<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blackberry=Whackberry &#187; BES Patching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whackberry.com/archives/tag/bes-patching/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whackberry.com</link>
	<description>BlackBerries are Whack....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:33:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>BES Patching&#8230; An IT Nightmare!</title>
		<link>http://www.whackberry.com/archives/25</link>
		<comments>http://www.whackberry.com/archives/25#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TCS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BES outage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BES Patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whackberry.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Ok, so patching any server is never just a walk in the park&#8230; but it&#8217;s not supposed to be the sort of thing which has to be attempted more than once.  Each failed attempt makes &#8220;higher ups&#8221; more and more wary of the competency of the IT staff.  So what types of concerns are there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29" title="bes" src="http://www.whackberry.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/bes.jpg" alt="bes" width="273" height="249" /></p>
<p>Ok, so patching any server is never just a walk in the park&#8230; but it&#8217;s not supposed to be the sort of thing which has to be attempted more than once.  Each failed attempt makes &#8220;higher ups&#8221; more and more wary of the competency of the IT staff.  So what types of concerns are there with the BES patch process?<span id="more-25"></span>Well it&#8217;s not so much the process&#8230; actually, it&#8217;s not the post-patch issues.  Once patching has occurred, the BES needs to make connection with each and every device to push out new service books and &#8220;re-scan&#8221; the users&#8217; mailboxes.  While this process really isn&#8217;t all that complicated, the time it takes to re-connect with each device is significant.  This time is increased exponentially when there&#8217;s a hefty amount of users.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just say an organization has about 2000 users on a single BES which they&#8217;d like to patch to say 4.1.6 or 5.0.  As it stands, post-patching connectivity would probably take in the neighborhood of about a day or two.  What self-respecting business has that much time to have users without connectivity?  So as a word of advice&#8230; When implimenting a new BES environment, go with the highest possible version to delay having to patch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whackberry.com/archives/25/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
